
30.3K
Downloads
303
Episodes
Interviews along with a Q&A format answering questions about safety. Together we‘ll help answer not just safety compliance but the strategy and tactics to implement injury elimination/severity.
Interviews along with a Q&A format answering questions about safety. Together we‘ll help answer not just safety compliance but the strategy and tactics to implement injury elimination/severity.
Episodes

Monday Feb 19, 2024
Episode 120 - NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limits (REL)
Monday Feb 19, 2024
Monday Feb 19, 2024
Episode 120 digs into NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limits (RELs)—what they are, why they matter, and how they differ from OSHA’s regulatory limits. Dr. Ayers uses this episode to highlight a critical truth in occupational health: OSHA tells you what’s legal; NIOSH tells you what’s safe.
Core Message
NIOSH RELs are science‑based exposure limits designed to protect workers’ health—not to meet minimum compliance. They reflect current research, toxicology, and real‑world exposure data, making them far more protective than OSHA’s decades‑old PELs.
Key Points from the Episode
1. What NIOSH RELs Are
-
Non‑regulatory, science‑driven exposure limits.
-
Developed using toxicology, epidemiology, and modern industrial hygiene research.
-
Intended to prevent both acute and chronic health effects.
-
Often significantly lower (more protective) than OSHA PELs.
RELs represent best‑practice exposure guidance, not minimum standards.
2. Why RELs Matter
-
OSHA PELs are outdated—many haven’t changed since the 1970s.
-
New research often shows harm at levels below OSHA limits.
-
RELs help organizations protect workers even when regulations lag behind.
-
They support proactive hazard control and long‑term health protection.
Using RELs demonstrates a commitment to safety beyond compliance.
3. How RELs Are Developed
NIOSH evaluates:
-
Toxicology and dose‑response data
-
Epidemiological studies
-
Workplace exposure patterns
-
Long‑term health effects (cancer, sensitization, organ damage)
-
Technological feasibility of controls
The result is a limit designed to prevent all known health effects, not just the most severe ones.
4. RELs vs. OSHA PELs
RELs:
-
Based on current science
-
More protective
-
Updated as new research emerges
-
Non‑regulatory but highly respected
PELs:
-
Legally enforceable
-
Often outdated
-
Sometimes based on old technology or economic considerations
Dr. Ayers emphasizes that relying solely on PELs can leave workers exposed to harmful levels of chemicals.
5. How Safety Leaders Should Use RELs
-
Compare RELs to PELs when assessing risk.
-
Use RELs to guide ventilation, PPE, and engineering controls.
-
Incorporate RELs into written programs and exposure assessments.
-
Communicate to leadership why RELs matter for long‑term worker health.
-
Use RELs when selecting sampling methods (often paired with NIOSH methods).
Organizations that adopt RELs typically see fewer occupational illnesses and better control strategies.
Practical Takeaway
NIOSH RELs are one of the most powerful tools for protecting workers from chemical and airborne hazards. They reflect current science, not outdated regulations, and help safety leaders make decisions that truly safeguard long‑term health.

No comments yet. Be the first to say something!